It was long after glacial floods of 10000 BC, Matsya incarnation during this flood and Rama birth after that were in years when it was Prabhava year both as per Pitamaha and Surya Siddhartha. There many other broad indicators of Rama period. If Indian chronology traditions are inaccurate, then we should not calculate on its basis. By trying to change many thousands of such calculations to show our wisdom, we are denying the whole knowledge structure of India. Vakyakaran calculations and many dates of Kerala texts on jyotish are given on that basis. All our calendar calculations are from start of Kali on 17-2-3102 BC Ujjain midnight. Even half periods or 3339 Tithis is also symmetric which is indicated in Rigveda 3/3/9 and puranas. Calculation only on basis of eclipses is also not proper as they are repeated after 18 years 10.5 days which is joint motion of Rahu and Sun. Nilkanth ji talks only about motion of Arundhati whose interpretation is doubtful and motion over long periods is inaccurate. Part 4 and 5 are on Vedic view of equinoctial movement and the Vedic version of the stars identified with the constellation of Shishumara.Īll the videos can be accessed in the following links: I have released 8 videos so far narrating the issues with the Mahabharata date of Mr Nilesh Oak. (I have validated the traditional date of Mahabharata war in the year Krodhi, Shukla Dwadasi (the day after Gitopadesa) that coincided with OctoBCE in Gregorian calendar occurring 35 years before the start of Kali Yuga when Krishna exited the world)Ĭheck out the label in the side bar " Nilesh Nilkanth Oak" to read all the articles I have written critiquing various issues of his date of Mahabharata and Ramayana.
Date of Mahabharata from Internal Evidences List of Manipulations done by Nilesh Oak to "corroborate" his date of Mahabharata:Ģ.
Two chapters of this book can be read in ġ.
0 kommentar(er)
